An Investigation of Phytochemical, Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents and Antioxidant Activity in Aerial Parts of Two Species of Salvia and the Effect of Environmental Factors on their Distribution in Behshahr Hezarjarib Area

Isa Jafari Foutami, Mousa Akbalou, Masoumeh Mazandarani and Mohammad Rahim Forouzeh

Published Date: 2018-05-11
DOI10.21767/2472-0151.100034

Isa Jafari foutami1*, Mousa Akbarlou2, Adel Sepehry3, Masoumeh Mazandarani4 and Mohammad Rahim Forouzeh5

1Department of Rangeland Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

2Associate Professor, Department of Rangeland, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3Professor, Department of Rangeland, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

4Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch, Gorgan, Iran

5Assistant Professor, Department of Rangeland, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Isa Jafari Foutami
Department of Rangeland Sciences
Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
Iran (Republic of Islamic)
Tel: 00989112580834
E-mail: isa.jafari84@gmail.com

Received Date: March 03, 2018; Accepted Date: May 03, 2018; Published Date: May 11, 2018

Citation: Foutami IJ, Akbalou M, Sepehry A, Mazandarani M, Forouzeh MR. An Investigation of Phytochemical, Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents and Antioxidant Activity in Aerial Parts of Two Species of Salvia and the Effect of Environmental Factors on their Distribution in Behshahr Hezarjarib Area. Herb Med. 2018, Vol.4 No.1:02. doi: 10.21767/2472-0151.100034

Copyright: © 2018 Foutami IJ, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Herbal Medicine: Open Access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was an investigation of phytochemical and antioxidant characteristics in aerial parts of Salvia multicaulis Vahl and Salvia Sclarea L. and the effect of ecological factors on their distribution in Behshahr Hezarjarib area. Salvia grows wildly in the north of Iran. Literature review has shown that there is no report on phytochemical investigation about aerial parts of Salvia in north of Iran. In order to understand the relationship between vegetation and environmental factors, the PCA (Principle Component Analysis) method has been adopted. Essential oil of the aerial part of Salvia was analyzed by GC/MS. Antioxidant activities were evaluated by DPPH test. Thirteen and five components were identified representing 94.01% and 99.9% of the oils, respectively. The main compounds of Salvia multicaulis Vahl were α-Pinene (29.82), 1,8-Cineole (23.84) and Camphor (19.93) while 1,6-Cyclodecadiene (41.95) and β-Caryophyllene (36.19) were the major ingredients of Salvia Sclarea L.

Keywords

Salvia multicaulis Vahl; Salvia Sclarea L; Antioxidant activity; Essential oil composition; PCA; North of Iran

Introduction

Salvia species are important because of their multiple uses like: anti-bacterial, anti-virus, anti-oxidant, anti-malarial, antiinflammatory, anti-diabetic, cardiovascular, anti-tumor and anti-cancer. Each species contains lots of flavonoids and tannin (Caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, gallic acid) [1]. Aerial parts of S. sclarea L. are recommended as energy providers and the antiseizure. Their flowering branches are used as aromatic and Sweetener. Essential oils of clary sage are used in making Perfume and cologne [2]. Most components of essential oils of S. sclarea L. are Linalyl acetate, Linalool, α-Terpineol, Dgermacrene, β-caryophyllene, B-cyclo germacrene, Sclareol, Geranyl [3,4]. S. sclarea, S. multicaulis and S. verticillata have moderate-to-high antimicrobial effects [5].

Song et al. analyzed grassland plant communities in the Baloung Mountain [6]. They adopted TWINSPAN and DCA for classification and ordination. Munhoz et al. investigated the association between plant species and environmental factors in humid savannah, central area of Brazil. The Significant correlation was found by CCA between soil texture and moisture with the distribution of plant species. Yibing applied CA and PCA in China and found that soil physical and chemical properties like nutrients, moisture, salinity and pH affected on homogeneous habitat, controlled distribution of plant communities in these areas [7].

Mills et al. conducted a study in the semi-arid regions Caro in South Africa to evaluate the permeability of the soil as an influential factor in diversity and richness of vegetation in these areas [8]. Regression results data proved that the highest species richness was found in places that permeability and pH were low, and the soil has high nitrogen content.

The study in the forests of southwest China indicated that topographic factors: elevation, slope and the protrusions rocks, and soil parameters like total phosphorous, potassium and exchangeable calcium affect the distribution of plant communities [9]. Vogiatzakis et al. evaluated the macrophyte community structure and the presence of species in relation to environmental constraints in Greece and concluded that the most substantial environmental factor on this situation is Water storage in the soil and water holding capacity [5].

In the present study, we investigated the phytochemical, antioxidant characteristics and the amount of flavonoids and phenolic compounds in aerial parts of Salvia multicaulis Vahl and Salvia Sclarea L. and the effect of ecological factors on their distribution in Behshahr Hezarjarib area.

Materials and Methods

General

The aerial parts of Salvia multicaulis Vahl and Salvia Sclarea L. were collected at full flowering stage in May 2017 from Hezar Jerib area, Mazandaran province, north of Iran. The Study area is located in the north of Iran and is part of the Hezar Jerib highland. Longitude is 54°03’48“ to 53°58’16“ east and Latitude is 36°34’22“ to 36°24’18“ north. Its altitudinal range is between 1600 to 2800 meters above sea level. The airdried and powdered plant samples (10 g) were extracted for 48 h using 200 mL n-hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol, successively by maceration on a shaker at room temperature. The extracts were filtered and concentrated by a rotary evaporator at 40°C. The filtered extracts were stored at -20°C until the experiment. Essential oils were obtained from airdried and comminuted aerial parts and roots (100 g each) by hydro-distillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus for 4 h.

GC/MS analysis

The essential oil of Salvia specimens was analyzed by GC-MS using an Agilent 7890 A. Film thickness of 0.25 μm, a length of 30 m, and an internal diameter of 0.25 mm. The carrier gas was helium. Inlet temperature was 230°C and injector temperature was 280°C [10].

Total phenolic contents evaluation

The total phenolic contents of the plant extracts were estimated by using Folin-Ciocalteu assay [11]. 2.5 mL of samples were mixed with 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Then 50 μL of sodium carbonate (7%) was added to the mixtures and the volume was adjusted to 250 mL by adding distilled water. The mixtures were mixed thoroughly for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Absorbance of the sample solutions against a blank was determined at 765 nm using a micro plate reader. Total phenolic contents were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry extract (mg GAE/g of extract). Different concentrations of gallic acid as standard (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/mL) were used to construct a calibration curve. All measurements were carried out in triplicate [10].

Total flavonoid contents evaluation

The total flavonoid content of the extracts was estimated according to a previously described method [11]. The absorbance was measured against a blank at 510 nm. Results were expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents per gram of dried extract. Different concentrations of quercetin as standard (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/mL) were used to construct a calibration curve. All measurements were carried out in triplicate [10].

Antioxidant activity

DPPH free radical scavenging assay: DPPH radical scavenging activity of the six extracts was measured according to the method described by Kofidis [12]. 50 μL of various concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 μg/mL) of the extract solutions in methanol were added to 200 μL of 100 μM DPPH solution in methanol. BHT was used as the standard antioxidant. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in darkness, and then absorbance was determined at 517 nm with a microplate reader spectrophotometer (BioTek XS2 model). The control contained 50 μL of methanol in place of the test sample, and the blank contained pure methanol instead of DPPH solution. Experiments were carried out in triplicates. The percentage of inhibition for each concentration was calculated according to the following equation:

%Inhibition=[1-(As-Ab)/Ac] × 100

While absorbing from the mixture in the presence of the samples, Ab is absorbing of blank and Ac is absorbing of control. A lower absorbance of the mixture indicated a higher DPPH radical scavenging potential. IC50 value (μg extract/mL) was the concentration at which 50% of DPPH radicals, is inhibited and obtained by interpolation from linear regression calculation [10].

Factors affecting distribution

For each species, 5 soil samples were collected, Soil samples were taken from depths of 0 to 30 cm. Soil texture was determined by the hydrometer methods. Soil acidity in the saturation paste was determined by using a pH meter. EC was determined by the electrical conductivity meter [13]. Soil organic carbon was measured by titration [14]. The lime was obtained from the reaction of hydrochloric acid normal with soil calcium carbonate profit by titration. Bulk density was measured by paraffin method [15]. Soil moisture was measured by weight methods [16]. Potassium and sodium were determined by a flame photometer and calcium and magnesium were determined by titration method [17]. Classification of vegetation has different methods that in this study were adopted the conventional method called hierarchical cumulative (cluster analysis). SPSS 19 software was adopted and Edwards’s method was adopted to calculate the distance between the clusters in the cluster analysis. The Euclidean index was considered as distance index. The output of this analysis was interpreted as a dendrogram.

Statistical analysis

PCA analysis was adopted to analyze the relationship between species and samples in two space dimensions.

Results and Discussion

Evaluation of ecological requirements

Results showed that Salvia Sclarea L. grow in 1620 m height, in 75 km distance from Behshahr City and in its habitat average annual rainfall is 363.93 mm, average annual temperature is 10.16°C and soil properties like: Organic matter, CaCO3, pH and EC are 5.78, 29.43, 7.48 and 0.60, respectively (Table 1).

  OM % CaCO3
%
Ph EC
(ds/mm)
Moisture
%
K
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
Clay % Silt % Sand %
Salvia
sclarea L.
5.78 29.43 7.48 0.6 14.01 7.58 9.36 16.52 0.8 16.93 11.4 71.66
Salvia
multicaulis Vahl
3.61 37.23 7.64 0.6 13.85 5.4 8.59 18 0.57 17.06 18.13 64.93

Table 1: Soil properties.

Results showed that Salvia multicaulis Vahl grow in Hezar Jerib summer rangeland, in 2260 m height, in 150 km distance from Behshahr City, and in its habitat average annual rainfall is 184.65 mm, average annual temperature is 7.213°C and soil properties like: Organic matter, CaCO3, pH and EC are 3.61, 37.23, 7.64 and 0.60, respectively (Table 1).

46 species belong to 42 Genus and 16 families were identified in the habitats of Salvia Sclarea. Gramineae family has more species and also Hemicryptophyes is the most frequent (Table 2).

Botanical name Family Life Form Growth Form
Agropyron aucheri Boiss. Gramineae p He
Agropyron trichophorum (Link) K.Richt. Gramineae p He
Alliaria officinalis (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande Brasicaceae A He
Amygdalus lycioides Spach. Rosaeae p Ch
Ballota nigra L. Labiatea p He
Berberis vulgaris Berberidaceae p Ch
Bromus dontonieae Gramineae p He
Bromus tomentellus Boiss. Gramineae p He
Centaurea sp Compositae p He
Corronilla sp Leguminoseae p He
Cosinia sp Compositae p He
Crataegus melanocapra M. Bieb. Rosaceae p Ph
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Poaceae p He
Dactylis glomerata L. Gramineae p He
Delphinium elbursens Ranunculaceae p He
Dianthus crinitus Sm. Caryophyllaceae p He
Echinops orientalis Trautv. Compositae p He
Festuca ovina L. Gramineae p He
Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Gramineae p He
Hordeum fragile Boiss. Gramineae p He
Hulthemia persica Scrophulariaceae A Ge
Melica persica Kunth, Révis. Gramineae p He
Mentha pulegium L. Labiateae p He
Nepeta racemosa Lam. Labiateae p He
Origanum vulgare L. Labiateae p He
Phlomis anisodonta Boiss. Labiateae p He
Plantago sp Plantaginaceae p He
Poa pratensis L. Gramineae p He
Poa annua L. Gramineae A Th
Potentilla canescens Raf. Rosaceae p He
Primula acaulis Primulaceae p He
Rubus idaeus L. Rosaceae p Ch
Salvia sclearia L. Labiatea A Th
Sedum acer L. Crassulaceae p Ch
Senecio vulgaris L. Compositeae A Th
Setaria viridis (L.) P.Beauv. Gramineae A He
Silene pruinosa Boiss. Caryophyllacee A Th
Stachys inflate Benth. Labiateae p He
Stellaria veridis Gramineae A He
Stipa barbata Desf. Gramineae p He
Taraxacum montanum (C.A.Mey.) DC. Compositeae A Th
Tragopogon officinalis L. Compositeae A Th
Trifolium repens L. Leguminoseae A He
Valeriana sisymbrifolia Kabath. Valerianaceae p He
Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. Labiaceae p He

Table 2: Associated species of Salvia sclarea L., as well as life forms, growth forms. Geophytes: Ge, Phanerophytes: Ph, Chameophytes: Ch, Throphytes: Te, Hemicryptophytes: He, annual: A, perennial: P.

Hemicryptophytes with 71.73% abundance has been recognized as the dominant growth forms. Geophytes with 2.17%, Phanerophytes with 2.17%, Throphytes with 13.4% and Chameophytes with 10.86% are other forms (Figure 1).

herbal-medicine-frequency-species

Figure 1: The frequency of species according to growth forms.

Perennial plants are the dominant life forms with 76.08%. Another species are annual with 23.92% (Figure 2).

herbal-medicine-life-forms

Figure 2: The frequency of species according to life forms.

36 species belong to 27 Genus and 15 families were identified in the habitats of Salvia multicaulis Vahl. Leguminoseae family has more species and also Hemicryptophyes is the most frequent (Table 3).

Botanical name Family Life Form Growth Form
Acantholimon embergeri Mobayen Plumbaginaceae p Ch
Achillea sp Composite p He
Anemone sp Ranuunculaceae A Ge
Astragalus barrii Barneby. Leguminoseae p Ge
Astragalus Canadensis L. Leguminoseae p He
Astragalus confuses Bunge. Leguminoseae A Th
Astragalus delutulus Maassoumi. Leguminoseae p He
Astragalus platysematus Bunge. Leguminoseae A Th
Astragalus rahensis Sirj. & Rech.f. Leguminoseae p He
Astragalus stenalepis Fisch Leguminoseae A He
Astragalus subsecundus Boiss. & Hohen. Leguminoseae p He
Bromus tomentellus Boiss. Gramineae p He
Carpinus betulus L. Corylaceae p Ph
Ceratacarpus sp Chenopodiaceae A He
Chenopodium sp Chenopodiaceae p He
Cuscuta sp Cuscutaceae p He
Dianthus crinitus Sm. Caryophyllaceae p He
Lactuca scariolla L. Composite p He
Melica persica Kunth Gramineae p He
Nepeta racemosa Lam. Labiateae p He
Noaea mucronata (Forssk.) Asch. & Schweinf. Chenopodiaceae A Th
Onobrychis cornuta (L.) Desv. Papilionaceae p He
Onopordon sp Compositae p He
Piper betle L. Piperaceae A Th
Rhamnus cathartica L. Rhamnaceae p Ph
Salsola sp Chenopodiacae A Th
Salvia multicaulis Vahl. Labiatae A Th
Secale cereale L. Gramineae p He
Secale montanum Guss. Gramineae p He
Silene pruinosa Boiss. Caryophyllacee A Th
Sorbus boissieri C.K. Schneid. Rosaceae p Ph
Teucrium chamaedrys L. Labiatae p Ch
Valeriana sisymbrifolia Kabath. Valerianaceae p He
Xanthium strumarium L. Compositeae A Th

Table 3: Associated species of Salvia multicaulis Vahl, as well as life forms, growth forms. Geophytes: Ge, Phanerophytes: Ph, Chameophytes: Ch, Throphytes: Te, Hemicryptophytes: He, annual: A, perennial: P.

Hemicryptophytes with 58.33% abundance has been recognized as the dominant growth forms. Geophytes with 5.5%, Phanerophytes with 8.33%, Throphytes with 22.22% and Chameophytes with 5.5% are other forms (Figure 3).

herbal-medicine-frequency-specimens

Figure 3: The frequency of specimens according to growth forms.

Perennial plants are the dominant life forms with 69.44%. Other specimens are annual with 30.55% (Figure 4).

herbal-medicine-frequency-species

Figure 4: The frequency of species according to life form.

Essential oil composition

The chemical composition of S. sclarea L. essential oil is summarized in Table 4. A total of 5 compounds were identified representing 99.9% of the total composition. The essential oil was dominated by 1,6-Cyclodecadiene (41.95%) and β- Caryophyllene (36.10%) (Table 4). Soković done a research on the chemical composition of wild S. sclarea L. in Serbia and shown that main component is the diterpene sclareol (28.29%) [18]. Pitarokili et al. recognized 66 compounds and linalyl acetate, linalool, geranyl acetate, and terpineol were the main components [19]. The results of Fraternale et al. shown that linalool, linalyl acetate, geranyl acetate, trans-β-ocimene, and caryophyllene oxide were the dominant components [20]. Dzamic et al. concluded that the main components of Salvia Sclarea L. were linalyl acetate (52.83%), linalool (18.18%), α- terpineol (5%), α-pinene (4.57%), 1.8-cineole (2.29%), limonene (1.55%), β-caryophyllene (1.83%) and β-terpineol (1.19%) and identified 34 components [21]. Ghani et al. reported that the major constituents of the essential oil of (Salvia Sclarea L.) cultivated in Mashhad climatic conditions were linalool (30.03%), linalyl acetate (23.08%) and α-terpineol (11.13%) [22]. In another study in Tajikistan, Sharopov and Setzer the main composition of essential oil were the monoterpenic ester linalyl acetate and alcohol linalool [23]. The result of all above studies are different from our result, based on GC/MS result 1,6-Cyclodecadiene and β- Caryophyllene were main components, While in other researchers has never been mentioned about them.

S. No Compounds RI Percentage
1 Copaene 1475 6.25
2 β-Caryophyllene 1565 36.1
3 1,6-Cyclodecadiene 1733 41.95
4 Germacrene B (CAS) 1219 9.77
5 Naphthalene 963 5.92
  Total   99.99

Table 4: Constituents of the essential oils from the aerial part of Salvia sclarea L.

The chemical composition of plants is known to be influenced by several external factors including harvest time, climatic and seasonal factors, as some compounds may be accumulated at a particular period to respond to environmental changes. Plant material collected at different times of the year may contain different novel compounds with other bioactivities. The effects of seasonal variations on the chemical and biological characteristics of some essential oils of the Lamiaceae family have been reported in the literature [12].

Results of GC/MS indicated that 13 compounds were identified in the essential oil from the aerial parts of Salvia multicaulis Vahl. The major components were α-Pinene (29.82%), 1,8-Cineole (23.84%) and Camphor (19.93%) (Table 5).

S. No Compounds RI Area %
1 α-Pinene 1112 29.82
2 Camphene 1036 11.63
3 β -Pinene 1018 2.16
4 Limonene 1103 2.67
5 1,8-Cineole 1013 23.84
6 Camphor 1232 19.93
7 Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane 983 5.13
8 Isoxazole 863 0.52
9 γ-Terpinene 1030 1.65
10 Camphene 1126 0.8
11 α.-Humulene 1439 0.57
12 α -Amorphene 834 0.47
13 delta-Cadinene 1773 0.82
  Total   94.01

Table 5: Constituents of the essential oils in the aerial part of Salvia multicaulis Vahl.

The result of our study is different from the other world surveys. According to Ahmadi and Mirza, bornyl-acetate and camphor have the highest percentages among the constitute of S. multicaulis Vahl, while we have detected only high amounts of camphor (19.93%) and there is no bornyl-acetate in our results [24]. Also, Senatore et al. reported that the major components of essential oils of Salvia multicaulis Vahl growing wild in Lebanon were α-copaene (8.0%), α-pinene (6.6%), myrtenol (5.7%) and trans-sabinyl acetate (5.3%) [25]. Feo et al. reported that the oil of Salvia multicaulis Vahl var. simplicifolia is rich of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, and our results are also contradictory with these results [26]. In similar examples, Rustaiyan et al. identified high amounts of α- pinene (26.0%), 1,8-cineole+limonene (20%) and camphor (10.0%) [27]. 1,8-cineole, camphor, α-pinene, valeranone and alpha-eudesmol were reported as the major components of Salvia multicaulis Vahl essential oil [28].

Tepe et al. found 47 compounds in Salvia multicaulis Vahl essential oil and α-pinene and Eucalyptol are the main constituents [29].

Comparison between our results and the results of the other reports showed differences, probably due to that plant varieties or sites, as well as the time of sampling. The variations in chemical compositions of the essential oils with respect to the season might have been due to the influence of phenological status, and environmental conditions can influence the regulation of the biosynthesis of essential oil [30].

Antioxidant activity and total flavonoids and phenolic compounds

As you can see in Table 6, antioxidant activity, total flavonoids and phenolic compounds of Salvia multicaulis are higher than Salvia Sclarea.

  DPPH (μg/mL) Total Flavonoids (mg QCE/g) Total Phenolic Content (mg GAE/g)
Salvia sclarea L. 52.3 2.35 41.23
Salvia multicaulis Vahl. 54.34 3.13 89.88

Table 6: Antioxidant activity and the amount of flavonoids and phenolic compounds of aerial part of Salvia sclarea L. and Salvia multicaulis Vahl.

Lamiaceae family is very significant in terms of antioxidant activity [31-33]. Peng et al. antioxidant activity has important roles in foods and biological systems as preventing free radicals from damaging role [34]. Karamian et al. showed that DPPH activity, total phenol and flavonoid contents of Salvia multicaulis Vahl are, 0.112, 3.70 and 1.12, respectively, but in our study these values are different [11]. Other researchers like; Nickavar et al., Esmaeili et al. and Tepe et al. done studies on DPPH radical-scavenging activity of Salvia multicaulis Vahl but their results are different [35-37]. The reasons for these differences may be due to differences in soil and climatic. Phenolic compounds act as a free radical terminator and they are antioxidative agents [38]. Flavonoids have the considerable role on human health and their activities are as an antioxidant [11]. The Result showed that S. multicaulis Vahl has a higher content of total phenol and flavonoid contents. Asadi represented 85.10 (mg GAE g 01 DW) and 46.21 (mg CUE g 01 DW) for total phenols and total flavonoid in Salvia multicaulis Vahl. Karamian et al. results showed that total phenol and flavonoids compounds are 3.70 ± 0.25 (mg/g dw) and 1.12 ± 0.12 (mg/g dw), respectively [11].

Kharazian et al. compared the amount of total flavonoids in seven wild growing salvias and concluded that between these salvias, S. multicaulis Vahl has the most amounts of flavonoids [39].

The results of the relationship between vegetation and environmental factors by PCA

The results of this method are in Table 7 that including Eigen values and variance Percentage for each of the components (axes). As you can see, three components are substantial include component one 45.81%, component two 30.36% and component three 23.82%.

Components Eigen Value Percentage of Variance Cumulative Variance
1 7.788 45.811 45.811
2 5.162 30.368 76.179
3 4.050 23.821 100.000
4 0.000 0.000 100.000
5 0.000 0.000 100.000
6 0.000 0.000 100.000
7 0.000 0.000 100.000
8 0.000 0.000 100.000
9 0.000 0.000 100.000
10 0.000 0.000 100.000

Table 7: The results of PCA analysis to determine the most substantial environmental factors.

Table 8 shows ordination habitats based on the first and second components. In first component (first axis) pH, CaCO3 and elevation decrease, and organic matter increase from left to right. In second component (second axis) Silt, Ca and Aspect decrease but Sand increase from down to up.

Factors First component Second component Third component Forth component Fifth component Sixth component
Sand 0.0546 0.3732 0.2523 -0.4993 0.0953 0.0391
Silt -0.1107 -0.3675 -0.2262 -0.2187 0.1060 -0.0090
Clay 0.1959 -0.2828 -0.2668 -0.6369 -0.0856 -0.0966
Mg 0.2479 0.2403 -0.2347 0.2569 0.0024 -0.0046
Ca 0.1559 -0.3347 0.2396 0.0689 0.2836 0.1369
Na 0.0863 0.0435 -0.4798 -0.2192 -0.2343 0.0883
K 0.3201 0.0367 0.2195 0.0031 0.0972 -0.2947
Moisture % 0.2561 -0.2699 -0.1672 0.0281 0.0458 0.4448
EC 0.2451 -0.2796 -0.1783 0.1996 0.0081 -0.3654
PH -0.3580 0.0072 -0.0208 -0.0855 -0.0076 0.1719
CaCO3 -0.3481 0.0850 -0.0680 -0.0622 0.1204 0.3062
Organic matter 0.3418 -0.1150 0.0730 0.0622 -0.1356 0.1681
Temp 0.2345 0.3226 -0.0921 -0.1482 0.0210 -0.0561
Rain 0.2345 0.3226 -0.0921 -0.0118 0.4637 0.2724
Slop 0.1630 -0.0457 0.4395 -0.3022 0.0770 -0.1507
Elevation -0.3493 -0.0919 -0.0383 -0.0479 0.5523 -0.4230
Aspect 0.0159 -0.3758 0.2873 0.0291 0.2612 -0.3373

Table 8: Specific vector values of each component.

The main components of the first and second graph (Figure 5) show distribution of species in relation to environmental factors by PCA analysis.

herbal-medicine-components-analysis

Figure 5: Ordination diagram sites by using principal components analysis.

The irst and second components are the main components and these components constitute 76.179 Percentages of changes in vegetation. The irst component is more substantial, it is including 45.811% of changes and the second component has 30.368 percentages of changes. Table 8 shown Vector eigen values for each variable in each of the components. According to coefficients, the irst component is including elevation, pH, CaCO3 and soil organic matter. Clay, silt, Ca and aspect are the most substantial factors in the second component.

Salvia multicaulis Vahl is in the third quarter of coordinate axis and due to the great distance compared to the second axis is more affected by the properties of the first axis and show a trend toward higher acidity, CaCO3 and elevation (Table 8, Figure 5).

As you can see, Salvia Sclarea L. is in the first quarter of coordinate axis and due to the great distance compared to the first axis is more affected by the properties of the second axis and show a trend toward higher Sand (Table 8, Figure 5).

Based on the results of soil properties (pH, CaCO3 and organic matter) are involved in the breakdown of plant distribution and this result has been approved by Sun et al. [14]. Brauch study results proved that the amount of sand and elevation are influencing factors to determine Venezuela Savanna. Among the investigated cations; just calcium has a role in distribution [40].

Zare Chahuki et al. Shown that soil texture is one of the main factors in controlling the vegetation distribution [41]. Soil texture effect on vegetation distribution is due to its effect on soil moisture because differences in the amount of moisture cause to changes in forming, soil structure filtration and the amount of its salinity [42]. Soil texture is mention in many studies as a factor that affecting the distribution of plant species [43-46].

Soil pH depends on soil organic matter, as you can see soil organic matter is S. sclarea habitat is higher than that of in S. multicaulis habitat and pH is on the contrary. According to David et al. more root biomass and more active microorganism metabolism in the rhizosphere can lead to the reduction in pH mean value of soil [47]. Hinsinger et al. noted that the secretion of organic acids from the roots and amounts of CO2 released from roots and micro-organisms could lead to the decrease in pH [48].

Topography along with climate and soil factors is another important factor that affects the vegetation distribution, altitude pattern can control the properties of climate (precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration) and soil.

Aspect is another environmental factor that influencing the vegetation distribution. Geographical factors like different aspect have effects on the amount of water available for plant, the temperature of soil and the amount of light absorbed by plant, so determine the ecological field of any species. Therefore, they can act as a limiting factor for plant propagation [49].

Conclusion

The results of the study reveal that, ecological requirements of each species are different and these ecological factors have the important effect on plants. Salvia multicaulis Vahl shows a trend toward higher acidity, CaCO3 and elevation but Salvia Sclarea L. shows a trend toward higher Sand. Associated species of Salvia Sclarea L. and Salvia multicaulis Vahl are different. The results showed that the number and type of Salvia Sclarea L. and Salvia multicaulis Vahl components were different. This survey shows the occurrence of α-Pinene (29.82) of Salvia multicaulis Vahl and 1,6-Cyclodecadiene (41.95) of Salvia Sclarea L. in Hezarjarib summer rangeland in the north of Iran. Differences between our study results and the results of other surveys could be attributed to the different environmental situation and climatic conditions, sampling times, geographic origins, soil characteristics, Plant life period, and extraction methods.

References

open access journals, open access scientific research publisher, open access publisher
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image
journal indexing image

Share This Article

paper.io

agar io

wowcappadocia.com
cappadocia-hotels.com
caruscappadocia.com
brothersballoon.com
balloon-rides.net

wormax io